Work Ethic, Employment Contracts, and Firm Value

نویسندگان

  • Bruce Ian Carlin
  • Simon Gervais
چکیده

Traditional agency theory assumes that managers are egoistic and need incentives to act in the best interests of the firm. As such, agency theory is a key determinant of firm size, capital structure, corporate governance, and firm value. However, traditional theory ignores the fact that some people are virtuous and do not need such incentives. If some employees are selfless, diligent, and have a sense of public duty, then the predictions of agency theory may be quite different. In this paper, we use a simplified principal-agent framework to show that the virtuosity of managers indeed affects the firm’s potential for growth, level of riskiness, and organizational structure. If a firm offers its managers a contract without incentives, it saves the cost of risksharing, but faces the risks of hiring egoistic agents who shirk or unskilled managers who cannot contribute to firm value. We derive the trade-offs that the firm faces when offering different employment contracts and show that these tradeoffs drive the firm’s optimal growth strategy and organizational structure. Surprisingly, we show that when the managers are more virtuous, the firm optimally chooses to invest in low-growth, low-risk projects and establishes a horizontal organizational structure. With less dedicated (egoistic) agents, the firm optimally chooses risky, high-growth projects and establishes a hierarchy in the organization. The analysis in this paper implies that corporate culture and societal norms are important drivers of firm structure and value. We would like to thank Alon Brav, Pino Lopomo, and David Robinson for helpful discussions at the inception of this project. Also providing useful comments and suggestions were Amil Dasgupta, Rich Mathews, Curtis Taylor, and seminar participants at Duke University. All remaining errors are of course the authors’ responsibility. Fuqua School of Business, Duke University, One Towerview Drive, Durham, NC 27708-0120, [email protected], (919) 619-5809. Fuqua School of Business, Duke University, One Towerview Drive, Durham, NC 27708-0120, [email protected], (919) 660-7683.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

A Legal Basis for Workers as Agents: Employment Contracts, Common Law, and the Theory of the Firm

The purpose of this paper is to show that the common law governing the employment of labor makes the distinction not only between employee and independent contractor but also between managerial control and agency. The idea is that common law precedents govern workers who are employed and managerially controlled without the requirement that formal, written contracts be established, and that thes...

متن کامل

Why Are There Explicit Contracts of Employment?

In this paper we explain the prevalence of explicit contracts of employment, particularly those that embody highrather than low-powered incentives and clauses that supersede the common law defaults. Our analysis is based on an understanding of two fundamental problems that arise when agency relationships are established between a worker and firm. The first is that agency relationships often req...

متن کامل

Competitive Search Equilibrium with Asymmetric Information∗

This paper explores the behavior of a model economy with search frictions and bilateral asymmetric information. Firms commit to employment contracts in an effort to attract workers. When a worker and firm meet, the worker must decide whether to supply effort to the employment relationship, thereby affecting the distribution of a match-specific productivity shock. Only the worker observes her ef...

متن کامل

Should You Allow Your Agent to Become Your Competitor? On Non-Compete Agreements in Employment Contracts

Should You Allow Your Agent to Become Your Competitor? On Non-Compete Agreements in Employment Contracts We discuss a principal-agent model in which the principal has the opportunity to include a non-compete agreement in the employment contract. We show that not imposing such an agreement can be beneficial for the principal as the possibility to leave the firm generates implicit incentives for ...

متن کامل

A Behavioral Foundation of the Employment Relation

Employment contracts give a principal the authority to decide flexibly which task his agent should execute. However, there is a tradeoff, first pointed out by Simon (1951), between flexibility and employer moral hazard. An employment contract allows the principal to adjust the task quickly to the realization of the state of the world, but he may also abuse this flexibility to exploit the agent....

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2006